Australia adopts same sex marriage: law and religion implications
“Legislation re-defining marriage to include same sex couples passed its final third reading stage in the Commonwealth House of Representatives this evening Australian time, December 7. The Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Bill 2017 will soon become law when it receives the Royal Assent.
In this post I want to start exploring some immediate implications for religious freedom and other ‘law and religion’ issues. …”
– Associate Professor Neil Foster shares some insights into the same-sex marriage legislation passed today.
He also addresses the idea that Bible-believing ministers should “‘hand in their license’ and no longer participate in solemnising any marriages for the purposes of the Marriage Act.”
Passing of Smith Bill shows Disregard for Freedoms — Coalition for Marriage
“The passing of the Dean Smith bill unamended through the House of Representatives today was evidence of the disregard that many MPs have for the freedoms of Australians and the upholding of international human rights obligations, the Coalition for Marriage said today.
‘It is deeply disappointing that both the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leader reneged on the assurances they gave to the Australian people during the marriage campaign,’ Coalition for Marriage spokesman, Lyle Shelton said. …”
– Read the full media statement from Coalition for Marriage here.
When freedom has been taken away
“What can we do? This is a question I’ve been asked several times since we lost the plebiscite battle for the definition of marriage.
Last week’s rejection of freedom of speech by the Senate has sent shock waves through churches, mosques and Christian and Muslim schools.
The House of Representatives, which is this week debating Liberal Senator Dean Smith’s same-sex marriage bill, is unlikely to improve things. …”
– Lyle Shelton at the Australian Christian Lobby writes about the challenging days ahead.
See also: Religious freedom protections must not be delayed – Freedom for Faith, 27 November 2017.
Our freedoms are too precious to sacrifice for same-sex marriage bill
“Based on recent events in Canberra where Turnbull’s Labor-lite co-conspirators refused to entertain any amendments to the same-sex marriage Act, it’s clear the approach is winners take all.
Not only does ramming the legislation through parliament show disrespect for the approximately 40 per cent of Australians who voted no to same-sex marriage, it also shows appalling disregard for the need to protect the liberties and freedoms we once took for granted. …”
– Dr. Kevin Donnelly writes this opinion piece in The Herald Sun. (Link via SydneyAnglicans.net)
Church leaders in last-ditch pushback against same-sex marriage bill
“Australia’s most senior churchmen, including the Anglican and Catholic archbishops of Sydney, have made a list-ditch plea to political leaders to salvage religious exemptions in the same-sex marriage bill.
Writing to Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Opposition Leader Bill Shorten, as many as 30 church leaders asked for reconsideration of a suite of amendments first proposed by Liberal senator James Paterson. …”
– Story from The Sydney Morning Herald.
Related:
Write to your MPs, via the Australian Christian Lobby.
Turnbull and Shorten must keep promise to Australians Voters – Coalition for Marriage.
Time to shine – responding to the trifecta
“There’s never been a better time than now to be a Christian, and to offer to our world the way of hope. God encourages us to shine like stars in the universe as we hold out the word of life (Philippians 2). And it’s never more timely than now.
- It’s official: the trifecta is in.The unborn child has no protection – it’s legal to take his or her life up to 24 weeks gestation and beyond that if two doctors agree (in Victoria). Though fearfully and wonderfully created in the image of God (Psalm 139), the unborn child is not safe even in the womb.
- The national same-sex marriage poll will soon deliver a fundamentally different view of what a marriage can be. In rebellion against God’s creational design and purpose for man and woman, sinful desires and unnatural relationships between persons of the same sex (Romans 1) are now given dignity through the redefinition of marriage.
- With Victoria leading the way, it will become legal to allow and assist people facing the prospect of a painful end, to take their own life. No longer content to rest in providence that God gives life and God takes away (Job 1), the state has become God. …”
Writing for his own denomination, Presbyterian Moderator-General John Wilson argues that there has never been a better time to be a Christian.
“Resignation from the Marriage Act”
”I will mail this letter to the Attorney General on the day that the Governor General signs into law the redefinition of marriage. …”
— Hobart Presbyterian Pastor Campbell Markham explains the reasoning behind his decision to relinquish his authority to conduct weddings.
Senate votes against same-sex marriage bill amendments
“All five amendments put forward by conservative senators James Paterson and David Fawcett to their Liberal colleague Dean Smith’s private same-sex marriage bill were voted down …
Senators Paterson and Fawcett’s changes sought to:
- Protect civil celebrants refusing to marry gay couples.
- Create two definitions of marriage — one as between a man and a woman and the other as between two people.
- Protect “relevant beliefs” around marriage.
- Prevent governments and agencies from taking action against people with a traditional view of marriage.
- Allow parents to remove their children from classes if they believe material taught is inconsistent with their views on marriage. …”
– Full story from The Daily Telegraph. (subscrip
Balancing Religious Freedom Rights is not ‘Discrimination’
“Australia is in the middle of a debate as to the extent to which religious freedom rights should be accommodated in legislation introducing “same sex marriage” (SSM). Those who object to this idea tell us that:
Christian conservatives – following the lead of their counterparts in the United States – seek to use freedom of religion to justify discrimination against members of the LGBTQI community. This agenda is now being pursued under the guise of the debate for a marriage equality bill. (“After the yes vote, let’s not remove one inequality and replace it with another” The Guardian online, 22 Nov 2017)
The word “discrimination” is a notoriously slippery one, and I would like to challenge the view that recognising religion freedom in changing marriage laws amounts to unjustified discrimination. …”
– Associate Professor in Law, Neil Foster, writes at Law and Religion Australia.
Anglican Bishop fears loss of religious freedom
“Prominent ‘No’ campaigner and the Anglican Bishop for South Sydney, Michael Stead explains how his religious freedom is being threatened by the Bill. …”
– Report from ABC Radio’s AM.
Same-sex marriage: Turnbull’s religious freedom inquiry
“Faith leaders may have welcomed the Turnbull government’s announcement of an inquiry into religious freedom protection, but some legal experts want more answers. …
‘If a school wishes to teach that marriage is not as the way the law defines, but as the way civilisation has known for millennia, then will that school be protected?’ Archbishop Davies asked. …”
– Report from SBS News, 22 November 2017.
Statement Regarding Prime Minister Turnbull’s Religious Freedoms Inquiry
“Today’s last-minute announcement by the Prime Minister that an inquiry will be held into religious freedom, only to report next year after the Marriage Act has changed, is a betrayal of the nearly 5 million Australians who voted against gay marriage.
Once again, the Turnbull Government has failed to consult relevant stakeholders. …”
– Read the full Media release from Coalition for Marriage.
Related: Philip Ruddock to review religious protections amid same-sex marriage debate – ABC News.
Same-Sex Marriage — An Initial Response
“The nation has decided in favour of same sex-marriage. It is now right for the parliament to implement the society’s wish.
Christians who voted ‘no’, and I am one, have a lot to be thankful for even in this result. …
So, with all this to be thankful for, am I pleased with the result? No, of course not. I voted against this decision and would do so again if asked to.
I’m saddened by it, not so much as a Christian but as an Australian. Marriage is a creation ordinance not a religious sacrament. I don’t think it is a good decision for Australian society or family life.”
– Phillip Jensen offers his initial response to the result of the Same-sex marriage postal survey.
Update:
The text of Phillip’s article is now also available in Simplified and Traditional Chinese.
Euthanasia Bill defeated by one vote in NSW Upper House
“After a marathon debate that ran all of Thursday and ended at nearly midnight, the bill to legalise voluntary assisted dying has failed to pass the New South Wales’ Upper House by a single vote.
With 19 voting in support but 20 against, the result came down to the wire. …
– Report from ABC News. (Image: St. Helen’s Bishopsgate.)
WA Anglican Bishop says ‘no’ to same-sex church weddings
“A WA Anglican bishop has declared he will not allow same-sex couples to marry inside Anglican churches, regardless of the consequences.
Gary Nelson, the bishop of North West Australia, was a vocal No campaigner during the postal survey.”
– Story from The West Australian.
See also: Same-sex marriage Yes vote threatens to cause rift in Anglican Church — ABC News.
