Responses to the C of E House of Bishops on civil partnerships and clergy
The announcement issued overnight by Bishop Graham James, Bishop of Norwich, on behalf of the House of Bishops of the Church of England:
“”The House has confirmed that clergy in civil partnerships, and living in accordance with the teaching of the Church on human sexuality, can be considered as candidates for the episcopate…”
From Andrew Goddard at the Anglican Communion Institute:
The press release describes the decision on civil partnered bishops as one of “confirmation”. This implies continuity with current policy. In fact, no priest in a civil partnership has ever been appointed as a bishop and the 2005 statement did not address this issue.
Full statement. (Italics added.)
And for Anglican Mainstream, Dr Philip Giddings and Canon Dr Chris Sugden:
As made clear in the Ordinal, Bishops of the Church of England promise both to fashion their own life and that of their household according to the way of Christ and to be guardians of the Church’s doctrine.
Given the ambiguous nature of civil partnerships, it would not be credible for a person in such a partnership to make such promises. Most people assume that civil partnerships are sexual relationships. It is casuistical to claim that they are not. This is presumably why many clergy in such partnerships refuse to “give assurances” to their bishops that theirs is a “non-sexual” relationship.
Since a decision to move from the current position would be a grave departure from the Church’s doctrine and discipline it should be made by Bishops in Synod not by Bishops alone. Otherwise it looks too much like salami-slicing away at the Church’s teaching.
A bishop known to be in a civil partnership could hardly be a focus of unity nor be a bishop for the whole church. Such an appointment would be a very divisive move both within the Church of England and in the wider Anglican Communion.
Dr Philip Giddings (Convenor)
Canon Dr Chris Sugden (Secretary)
Anglican Mainstream
(via e-mail.)
Peerage for the Archbishop of Canterbury
News from 10 Downing Street:
“Peerage for Dr Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury upon his retirement from the See of Canterbury.
The Queen has been pleased to confer a peerage of the United Kingdom for Life on the Most Reverend and Right Honourable Dr Rowan Williams Lord Archbishop of Canterbury upon his retirement from the See of Canterbury.”
The Episcopal News Service is reporting that Archbishop Williams will be known as ‘Baron Williams of Oystermouth’. (Oystermouth is near Swansea in Wales…)
The Queen’s Christmas Broadcast 2012
“This is the time of year when we remember that God sent his only son ‘to serve, not to be served’. He restored love and service to the centre of our lives in the person of Jesus Christ.”
– See Queen Elizabeth’s 2012 Christmas Broadcast (8’36”) – or read the text.
(Dr Rowan Williams’ Christmas message may be read here.)
Four videos from Reform on women bishops, sex equality and Church unity
Members of Reform explain their stand at last month’s General Synod of the Church of England:
- Video 1: Why did you vote against the Women Bishops Measure as it stands? Rod Thomas, Lorna Ashworth and Angus MacLeay – 4:46
- Video 2: Why do you believe what you believe about women bishops? – Rod Thomas, Angus MacLeay and Jane Patterson – 2:40
- Video 3: Is it sexist to vote against women bishops? – Susie Leafe – 1:12
- Video 4: How can we go forward as one Church united? – Rod Thomas – 44s
- Or all in one here. – 9:19.
Reform ‘nonplussed’ over C of E House of Bishops Working Group on Women Bishops
Reform Media Statement Dec 20, 2012
PRESS STATEMENT FROM REFORM
Following the announcement of the formation of a House of Bishops Working Group on 19th December, Reform chairman Rod Thomas has written to the Archbishops of Canterbury and York. The letter reaffirms Reform’s commitment to the process of seeking a new way forward on women bishops legislation, but says that the membership of the working group leaves it feeling ‘apprehensive’.
Prebendary Rod Thomas said he was ‘nonplussed as to why the membership of the working group does not contain anybody who shares our convictions about male headship – despite the fact that this was a key concern underlying the vote on 20th November.
We very much wish to contribute to fresh proposals that will command broader agreement in the General Synod than was achieved last month. Achieving such an outcome depends on hearing clearly the needs of those who were both for and against the draft Measure. Our fear is that the constitution of the working group might make this more difficult. Nevertheless we will seek to contribute positively during the discussions that are planned for next February.’
(via e-mail)
Reform Newsletter December 2012
Reform has posted excerpts from their current newsletter, with a focus on ‘the Women Bishops Measure’.
Twitter Christmas sermons for Anglican bishops
“Britain’s senior Anglican bishops will be tweeting their Christmas Day sermons for the first time this year. …
The Archbishop of Canterbury, the Most Reverend Rowan Williams, his soon-to-be successor the Bishop of Durham, the Right Reverend Justin Welby, and the Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu will be tweeting. …”
– BBC News.
‘Sadness and shock’ re Women Bishops vote
Statement on the Conclusion of the Meeting of the Archbishops’ Council of the Church of England:
“In its discussions the Council decided that a process to admit women to the episcopate needed to be restarted at the next meeting of the General Synod in July 2013.”
“The Archbishops’ Council of the Church of England met on November 27-28th to consider a wide ranging agenda. A substantial amount of time was given over to the discussion of the recent vote by General Synod on Women in the Episcopate.
“As part of their reflections, many council members commented on the deep degree of sadness and shock that they had felt as a result of the vote and also of the need to affirm all women serving the church – both lay and ordained – in their ministries.
“In its discussions the Council decided that a process to admit women to the episcopate needed to be restarted at the next meeting of the General Synod in July 2013. There was agreement that the Church of England had to resolve this matter through its own processes as a matter of urgency. The Council therefore recommended that the House of Bishops, during its meeting in a fortnight’s time, put in place a clear process for discussions in the New Year with a view to bringing legislative proposals before the Synod in July.”
– From the Anglican Communion News Service.
Related: Joint Press Statement from The Chairmen of The Catholic Group And Reform.
“It has never been our intention to prevent the consecration of women as bishops; our concern has always been for legislation which also made clear and fair provision for the substantial minority,” the Chairmen concluded.
‘Liberals in disguise’
“A lot of people seem to be confused after the decision by the Church of England’s General Synod not to approve the consecration of women as bishops. Let us begin by establishing the facts.”
– Gerald Bray gives is take on the background to, and the fallout from, the Women Bishops vote in the Church of England, at Anglican Ink.
Did no-one ask or care?
After one Sydney diocese ordination candidate met with the Archbishop’s Examining Chaplains, John Chapman asked him, “Brother, did they ask you if you put your trust in the Lord Jesus Christ? Did they ask you if you are a Christian?”
This video, from the UK’s Channel 4 demonstrates why that is an important question to ask.
‘A speech that sealed the vote’ in C of E General Synod
“It became clear… that many were not interested in such a fundamental debate but wished to initiate a process for the appointment of women bishops in the church as soon as possible. This process takes for granted secular assumptions about justice and equality rather than asking what the Bible means by such terms.”
– described by Anglican Mainstream as “A speech that sealed the vote”, Vicar of St Nicholas’ Sevenoaks, Angus Macleay sought to bring the issue back to the text of the Bible. Read his speech here.
Now keep calm and carry on
“The reaction of the British media to the result in the ‘women bishops vote’ (I hesitate to call it ‘bishopsgate’ for fear of offending William Taylor) is as predictable as the vote itself was surprising. The essence of most of the commentary I have read is: the church has voted for oppression of women and has made itself irrelevant…”
– Insightful comment from Carl Trueman at Reformation21.
The women bishops vote in the Church of England
Dr Mark Thompson writes on last night’s defeat of the Consecration and Ordination of Women Measure in the Church of England’s General Synod:
“If it had been passed, the dissenters would be excluded even further from the life of the Church of England over the next ten years and before long, as in many parts of The Episcopal Church, acceptance of women in the episcopate would be the litmus test for ordination.”
Full text below. Read more
C of E General Synod: Women Bishops measure narrowly lost
“Following 12 years of legislative progress and several hours of debate during the 20 Nov 2012 afternoon session of synod, the Consecration and Ordination of Women Measure failed to pass in all three houses of the Church of England’s legislative body.” – Anglican Ink.
See also: Reform statement. Church of England. BBC. The Telegraph (1). The Telegraph (2). Comment from Reformation21. EVNews. CEEC statement.
Also on ABC Radio’s The World Today. (Note that the while the transcript of ACL President Gavin Poole’s remarks says,
“I don’t think we should be surprised when those who halt the biblical teachings in the church appear out of step with the community.”
should be
“I don’t think we should be surprised when those who hold to the biblical teachings in the church appear out of step with the community.” It does change the meaning a little. ;-)
Dick Lucas gives thanks for Chappo
Wonderful words from Dick Lucas, past Rector of St. Helen’s Bishopsgate:
“…we join with friends in Sydney in blessing the Lord, who has now taken John away to be with Christ in glory, for giving him to us for so long, and for such grand purposes of grace.”
–
”Many at this time will wish to pay tribute to John Chapman, alias the unique and unforgettable ‘Chappo’. Allow me, as one such, to write very personally of a dear friend, a marvellously stimulating brother in Christ, a shrewd fellow worker and, of course, a superbly gifted evangelist and teacher. John knew his special calling, and, to his final days, was energetically gospelling and offering to all the possibility of a Fresh Start. This made his U.K. visits highly desired and valued.
Looking back, I recall another characteristic of Chappo – he was a great encourager of the brethren. I saw this in Australia at ministers’ meetings where John would always be present putting new heart and humour into everyone there. On one such occasion, when I was speaking, it was initially unsettling to have him lurking in the back row, making pungent and priceless comments sotto voce, causing a ripple of amusement to spread through the assembled company. With Chappo in attendance you had to be ready for anything, at any time!
As for his visits to this part of the world, when it was reported that Chapman was on the horizon, morale soared, and requests for his services poured in – this man was a tonic to have around. When in London Chappo often stayed with me. The day would begin with my calling him for breakfast, and delighting in the sound of his tread on the stairs, as he descended from his room on the top floor, humming, whistling, or otherwise making his happy noises, finally arriving, larger than life, full of cheerful talk, ready for the fray.
We commonly say of a person of note that we shall not see their like again. In John Chapman’s case I see this to be no less than the simple truth. As for his many friends in Britain, we join with friends in Sydney in blessing the Lord, who has now taken John away to be with Christ in glory, for giving him to us for so long, and for such grand purposes of grace.”
– Dick Lucas writes at the Proclamation Trust.