An Alternative Baptismal Liturgy

John RichardsonJohn Richardson in the UK proposes an alternative Baptismal liturgy for the Church of England. It has a bit more substance.

‘Is the Church of England ashamed to preach Christ crucified?’

christ-crucified“It must be the ultimate irony in liturgical development that the Church of England becomes ashamed of the exhortation not to be ashamed to confess the faith of Christ crucified …”

UK blogger ‘Archbishop Cranmer’ on the CofE trial Baptism service.

Anglican church accused of ‘dumbing down’ baptism service

Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali“The Church of England has been accused of ‘dumbing down’ the baptism service by changing its wording so parents and godparents no longer have to ‘repent sins’ and ‘reject the devil’.…”

– story from The Guardian.

‘Emulate Mandela’ says Abp of Canterbury

Abp Welby“People should pledge this new year to try and emulate Nelson Mandela and change the world around them, the Archbishop of Canterbury has said.”

– Report from BBC News.

Kirsty Birkett on The Pilling Report

Dr Kirsty BirkettDr Kirsty Birkett, at Oak Hill College in London, takes a look at The Pilling Report’s approach to Scripture –

1. Submitting to scripture?

“The majority of those writing the Pilling report felt unable to articulate what scripture actually says on the issue of homosexual activity.”

2. What if scripture really is unclear?

“‘But we do not all believe that the evidence of scripture points to only one set of ethical conclusions. In short, Christians who share an equal commitment to scripture do not agree on the implications of scripture for same sex relationships’ (The Pilling Report, 235).

This is one of many statements that the Pilling Report makes to the effect that it was impossible for the group to come to one mind on the meaning of scripture as regards homosexual relationships.”

Mike Ovey on The Pilling Report

Dr Mike OveyPrincipal of Oak Hill College, Dr Mike Ovey, has now posted eight responses to the Pilling Report (“the Report of the House of Bishops Working Group on Human Sexuality’).

1. God’s work versus God’s will?

“ultimately in practice, it prefers our judgment of what we think good to God’s judgment expressed in the scriptures of what is good.”

2. Does sincerity grant a veto?

“This creates the bizarre situation of an explicit submission to the authority of scripture, while not in fact applying what scripture says, either against same-sex marriages, or in favour.”

3. Groundhog Day: ‘scripture’s lack of clarity’

“As we have seen, judgments about the obscurity of scripture have been made before, notably in Roman Catholic responses to the Reformation.”

4. How common is the common ground?

“Like an iceberg, the most significant parts of the Pilling Report lie beneath the surface.”

5. Pursuing proven failure?

“They have talked at length, listened at length and have had both clerical and expert help in all their deliberations. They have listened both to each other and to a wide range of witnesses. But this process has not enabled them to reach a collective conclusion as to whether or not same-sex sexual relations in the context of a faithful long-term commitment are right or wrong.”

6. Common grace and stolen fruit

“After noting that the tradition of the church for 2,000 years and indeed worldwide at the moment is against recognition of same-sex marriages and relationships, the report nevertheless goes on to speak in laudatory terms about the same-sex couples who have testified before it.”

7. Suspecting the suspicious

“If we want a biblical precedent for a hermeneutics of suspicion where the hermeneutics of suspicion is wrongly placed, then we need look no further than Genesis 3:1ff.”

8. ‘We never make mistakes’?

“Churches can get things wrong. One of the more disturbing moments in the Thirty-Nine Articles comes in Article 19 which deals with the doctrine of the church.”

Global South Statement in response to the Pilling Report

Global South response to Pilling Report“The Global South considers forward movement on the Pilling Report’s recommendations as equal to what the North American churches did ten years ago which caused much confusion in the Communion.

This reminds us of Eli the High Priest who turned a blind eye to the wrongdoings of his sons which led to a period of spiritual dryness when the Spirit of God departed from the midst of His people (Ichabod).”

–  Archbishop Dr. Mouneer Hanna Anis, Chairman of the Global South of the Anglican Communion, and Archbishop Ian Ernest, Hon. General Secretary, have issued this Statement – read it via Anglican Mainstream (PDF file).

Mike Ovey responds to the Pilling Report

Dr Mike Ovey“We humans have to live with grey. Sometimes we must weigh whether an action or life-choice is right or wrong. But so often, actions and life-choices are shades of grey rather than simply black or white. …”

– Oak Hill’s Principal, Dr Mike Ovey, responds to the Pilling Report –

Part 1 – God’s work versus God’s will?

Part 2 – Does sincerity grant a veto?

Reform’s ReNew Conference 2013 audio files

Hugh PalmerReform’s “ReNew conference met Nov 26th to 27th, 2013. The conference was predominantly for church leaders and for women in paid positions of ministry in the Church of England. The purpose of the conference was to establish the basis on which Anglican evangelicals can work together and to begin to chart a way ahead.”

Audio files of the talks are currently being added to the Reform website. The audio is a little over-compressed, but is quite audible and the talks are well worth hearing.

So far they have the talks by –

The Church of England facing ‘officially sanctioned apostasy’?

The Rev Andrew SymesThe Rev. Andrew Symes, Executive Secretary of Anglican Mainstream, works through The Pilling Report (PDF) to see the huge impact if its recommendations were to be adopted in The Church of England.

From his conclusions:

“This is why we are faced with officially sanctioned apostasy in our own church. It has finally happened. What do we do? The first thing to say is that the report has not yet been endorsed by the house of Bishops. We must pray for them and lobby them as politely but intensively as we can before their meeting to discuss the document.”

– Be sure to take the time to read his analysis in full here.

Anglican Mainstream also has a comprehensive list of links to reactions to the Report.

And some essential background:

The Anglican Debacle: Roots and Patterns – Mark Thompson (from The Sydney Lambeth Decision Briefing – 16 March 2008)

The Limits of Fellowship – Phillip Jensen (from The Sydney Lambeth Decision Briefing – 16 March 2008)

Are we stronger than He? (PDF) – David Short (January 2005)

Some questions for the new Archbishop of Canterbury – by Mark Thompson (09 November 2012)

‘Tearing the Fabric’ — 2012 edition – American Anglican Council (PDF)

Reform’s Chairman ‘deeply ashamed’ of the ‘very divisive’ Pilling Report

Reform Chairman Prebendary Rod Thomas“Reform Chairman Prebendary Rod Thomas said today that he was “deeply ashamed” that the Pilling Report was opening up divisive discussions about the church’s stance on human sexuality.

He said: “Anglican evangelicals want to encourage the best possible provision of pastoral care for everyone involved in parish life. The calling of Christians is to a transformed life. True pastoral care in the case of those experiencing same-sex attraction will be to help them live Christianly. The report does not do this in its recommendations for “pastoral accommodation”. Reform profoundly regrets this insensitivity to real pastoral need.

Speaking at the close of the pan-evangelical ReNew conference, attended by over 250 senior Anglican leaders, Rod Thomas said that the report’s proposals were “very divisive and distressing”. He warmly endorsed the Bishop of Birkenhead’s dissenting statement with its understanding that the trajectory of the report “…undermined the discipleship and pastoral care of many faithful Christians”.

The Reform Council gave initial consideration to the report today. It concluded that the inevitable result of the report’s recommendations would be that pressure will increase for changes to the church’s understanding of marriage and of God’s purposes for human flourishing as outlined in the Bible. The Council reiterated its belief that the Anglican approach to doctrine and ethics can only be based on Scripture and therefore was not open to negotiation in facilitated conversations.”

– Source: Reform.

See also: The Bishop of Birkenhead’s dissenting statement.
Anglican Mainstream statement.

Church Society responds to the Pilling Report on sexuality

Church Society logo“Church Society welcomes the publication of the Report of the House of Bishops Working Group on Human Sexuality, so that it can be discussed openly and publicly by the whole church.

Like the apostle Jude, in the Bible, we would prefer to discuss the good news of Jesus Christ and the salvation he offers to all, but feel constrained to respond to the teaching of those who are changing the gospel into an affirmation of immoral behaviour.

We call on the church to read the report prayerfully, and to weigh its teaching and recommendations carefully in the light of scripture’s very clear teaching on sexuality, to which the Church of England is committed in its canons, doctrinal formularies, Synodical statements, and the resolutions of the Lambeth Conference. We particularly commend to people the “dissenting statement” in the report from the Bishop of Birkenhead, and thank him for its clarity and care. A further statement will be made in due course.” – Lee Gatiss, Director of Church Society.

Click here for full Pilling Report and CofE statement (CofE website).”

– from Church Society’s EV news.

Abp Welby’s presentation to the General Synod

Archbishop Justin Welby, General Synod, 18 Nov 2013Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby spoke on the first day of the Church of England’s General Synod in Westminster –

“While I was in Nairobi for the condolence visit, I was there just before the beginning of GAFCON, and I had the opportunity to benefit from meeting a number of primates who had arrived for it. This was a great pleasure, and, as always, an education. As leader of GAFCON Archbishop Wabukala was as gracious as could have been wished.

There were naturally, as you may have noticed, different views expressed about different aspects of the Anglican Communion while I was in Nairobi and subsequently, including views about me, it has to be said not invariably warm and cuddly, but I was genuinely most glad to have had the opportunity to meet, and I have to say that the overwhelming response was not only kind but also deeply encouraging.”

– full text at The Archbishop of Canterbury’s website.

Stay in Noah’s Ark — or get into the lifeboat?

Church Society“I’ve just completed four years of training for ministry in the Church of England, and, God willing, have ahead of me many years of gospel ministry in the Anglican Church.

However, there seems to me to be more pressure than ever to doubt the integrity of that position. How can an evangelical who takes seriously his stewardship of revealed truth, ever with a good conscience take office in the Church of England? …”

– At The Church Society, Oak Hill graduate Matt Graham asks if it’s worth sticking with the Church of England. (PDF file.)

Related: Audio files of talks from the Junior Anglican Evangelical Conference.

Blessing same-sex relationships in the Church of England?

The Rev Peter Ould“I have now confirmed from a number of sources what the Pilling Report is going to recommend. The final draft is ready and it will propose that the Church of England introduce some form of liturgy that will bless same-sex relationships. There is absolutely no doubt that this is what the outcome of the committee’s deliberations will be…

Once that happens we will have formally declared same-sex unions to be holy. In the Church of England our liturgy is our doctrine and the moment we have a rite that in any way affirms same-sex relationships then we will have fundamentally changed what we believe. …

The entire College of Bishops, not just Diocesans but every Suffragan as well, will meet on 27 January 2014 to discuss the report. This is likely to be an emotional event but it will be the first collective opportunity for Evangelical and Anglo-Catholic Bishops to clearly, gently but firmly say that they will have no part in this.”

– The Rev. Peter Ould in the UK sounds an ominous warning.

Background:

“05 January 2012. The membership of a group to advise the House of Bishops on the Church of England’s approach to human sexuality has been announced. The Group will be chaired by Sir Joseph Pilling…” – The Church of England website.

← Previous PageNext Page →