Bishop of London on St. Bartholomew the Great
“I read in the press that you had been planning this event since November. I find it astonishing that you did not take the opportunity to consult your Bishop. …”
The Bishop of London, Richard Chartres, has made available a letter he wrote to Dr Martin Dudley, St Bartholomew the Great, where the ‘gay wedding’ service was held. Read it, and a related public letter, at Thinking Anglicans. (Photo: Diocese of London.)
‘Gay wedding’: underlying problem of false teaching sidestepped
David Phillips, General Secretary of Church Society –
St Bartholomew the Great statements
The Diocese of London has issued a statement regarding the so called ‘gay blessing’ service at St. Bartholomew the Great. The Rector, Martin Dudley, who conducted the service has allowed a letter to be published in which he indicates that his action was not in line with the House of Bishops’ guidelines on civil partnerships. He goes on to indicate that he does not agree with those guidelines but will abide by them. He also calls attention to the anecdotal evidence that the guidelines are being breached by many others.
The House of Bishops guidelines were themselves a travesty because they do not uphold Biblical standards and accept the validity of Civil Partnerships which are a mockery of marriage. Moreover, the House of Bishops has consistently failed to stand against the root problem. They have focussed on certain actions such as entering into a Civil Partnership or being in a non-celibate relationship whilst ignoring the Biblical focus on false teaching.
Those who encourage others to sin are just as guilty, apparently more so, than those who engage in sin. Speaking of children the Lord Jesus Christ said: “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” (Matthew 18.6). And the Apostle James wrote reminding teachers of the weight of responsibility they bear – “we who teach will be judged more strictly” (James 3.1).
The presence of gross false teaching within the Church of England has fractured it as evidenced by the statement recently issued by members of the Deanery in which St. Bartholomew the Great is situated. The statement by Mr Dudley and the Diocese of London will not close the matter because the underlying problem of false teaching has once again been sidestepped.
David Phillips
General Secretary, Church Society.
– from Church Society’s news website, EVnews.
For earlier stories, see here.
Joint Statement made at City of London Deanery Synod
The latest from London –
“All of us who sign this statement are sinners and celebrating any of our sins would have just the same serious consequences.”
Joint Statement from the City of London Deanery Synod representatives from St Helen Bishopsgate, St Peter-upon-Cornhill, and St Botolph-without-Aldersgate, made at the Deanery Synod on 16th October 2008.
On 31 May 2008 at The Priory Church of St Bartholomew the Great the Revd Dr Martin Dudley conducted a service of blessing for the Revd Peter Cowell and the Revd Dr David Lord, subsequent to their civil partnership ceremony. We are grateful that the Bishop of London has called for an investigation, but given that our Deanery Synod meets on Thursday 16th October 2008 for fellowship and prayer we want to explain the degree to which that fellowship has been fractured. Read more
Joint statement by the Archbishops of Canterbury and York on ‘gay wedding’
“We have heard the reports of the recent service in St Bartholomew the Great with very great concern. We cannot comment on the specific circumstances because they are the subject of an investigation launched by the Bishop of London.
On the general issue, however, the various reference points for the Church of England’s approach to human sexuality (1987 Synod motion, 1991 Bishops’ Statement Issues in Human Sexuality, Lambeth motion 1:10, House of Bishops’ 2005 statement on civil partnerships) are well known and remain current.
Those clergy who disagree with the Church’s teaching are at liberty to seek to persuade others within the Church of the reasons why they believe, in the light of Scripture, tradition and reason that it should be changed. But they are not at liberty simply to disregard it.”
– from the Archbishop of Canterbury’s website. (Photo: Abp of Canterbury’s website.)
Dr Martin Dudley responds
The Rector of The Priory Church of St Bartholomew the Great, the Rev Dr Martin Dudley, has responded to the statement, made last week, by members of the Diocese of London Deanery. Read it at Anglican Mainstream.
And then read a critque of his response – “Martin Dudley mishandles Donatism” – by Peter Ould:
Is he arguing that we should simply ignore sin in the church? Or is he arguing that we shouldn’t discipline him, “because we’re all sinners”?
(Photo: Church of St Bartholomew the Great.)
‘Why I blessed gay clergymen’s relationship’
Robustly heterosexual since early adolescence, unable to see that any love surpasses the love of women, and once branded by the odious Daily Mail as ‘Dud the Stud’, I may seem miscast in the role into which I have now been thrust, that of the turbulent rebellious priest who defies bishop and archbishop to bless two gay men, also priests, in their civil partnership.
Yet there is a sense in which I have been moving towards this point for more than thirty years. The 1970s shaped my thinking. …
– Dr. Martin Dudley, the Rector of St Bartholomew the Great in the City of London, explains his actions to New Statesman.
Anger at Anglican gay ‘wedding’
Traditionalists in the Anglican Church have been angered by reports that two gay clergymen have exchanged vows in a version of a marriage ceremony.
The service, at St Bartholomew the Great Church in the City of London last month, used formal rites and was said to be the first in the Anglican Church. …
– Report from the BBC. See also this story from MailOnline.
AAC President’s update 20 November
Weekly Message from Bishop David Anderson, President of the American Anglican Council, November 20 2009
“In a newly authorized advertising campaign, TEC begins by saying, “As Episcopalians, we are followers of Jesus Christ, our Lord, and believe in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit,” and this sounds spot-on Christologically.”
Beloved in Christ,
Some banks, large and small, have gotten into a great deal of trouble during the last year and a half with uncollectible loans and assets that have steeply declined in value. In short, their books don’t balance, and people’s money is at risk. Fortunately for most bank customers, their accounts are FDIC insured, and when a bank fails, another absorbs it, and the customer’s accounts remain relatively safe.
When it comes to churches, another institution that people trust, the same safety isn’t always present. Banks hold our money, and if they lose it we can work to gain more, whereas churches deal with our soul, and if we lose that, we can’t pick up another at the shopping mall.
As an example, the Episcopal Church (TEC) has vastly overstated their membership strength, withheld the really bad financial news, degraded their theology, lost membership, and their members’ souls are in peril. Read more
Final decision from the Bishop of London
In a letter to clergy in the diocese (October 24th 2008) the Assistant Bishop of London declares that since Martin Dudley has apologised, the case is now considered closed.
– Read the letter here at Reform London.
For earlier stories, see here.
(Photo of Bishop Richard Chartres: Diocese of London.)
What we believe
The message at the heart of Christianity is really quite simple…